Fostering an atmosphere that prioritizes development over judgment is crucial to overcoming this obstacle. It can help allay worries and promote involvement if Test 22 is explained as a development tool rather than just an assessment. Making sure thebonus game evaluation is pertinent and appropriately represents the competencies being measured presents another difficulty. It takes time and money for organizations to create a strong framework for Test 22 that complies with best practices and industry standards. To keep the assessment criteria current in a constantly changing environment, it should be reviewed and updated on a regular basis. Organizations can optimize Test 22's usefulness as a developmental tool by proactively addressing these issues.